<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Licensing Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelicensinglawblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com</link>
	<description>Licensing and Intellectual Property Law in the Global Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:49:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud Services and SAAS Agreements: Clickwrap vs. Custom by Richard R. Bergovoy</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2011/03/cloud-services-and-saas-agreements-clickwrap-vs-custom/comment-page-1/#comment-20131</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard R. Bergovoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=1121#comment-20131</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Oliver W. You have a way with words yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Oliver W. You have a way with words yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud Services and SAAS Agreements: Clickwrap vs. Custom by Oliver W. Holmes</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2011/03/cloud-services-and-saas-agreements-clickwrap-vs-custom/comment-page-1/#comment-20125</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver W. Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=1121#comment-20125</guid>
		<description>Truly brilliant post. Vital knowledge delivered in a style that even non-techies can understand. Great work, blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly brilliant post. Vital knowledge delivered in a style that even non-techies can understand. Great work, blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud Services and SAAS Agreements: Clickwrap vs. Custom by jiah kim</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2011/03/cloud-services-and-saas-agreements-clickwrap-vs-custom/comment-page-1/#comment-20039</link>
		<dc:creator>jiah kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=1121#comment-20039</guid>
		<description>Great post that makes us realize lawyers have to stay on top of tech development to protect consumer rights. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post that makes us realize lawyers have to stay on top of tech development to protect consumer rights. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Licenses 2, Sales 0 in Eminem and Autodesk 9th Circuit Rulings by IP Osgoode &#187; US 9th Circuit puts foot down: Eminem iTunes royalties decision stands</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/09/licenses-2-sales-0-in-eminem-and-autodesk-9th-circuit-rulings/comment-page-1/#comment-5935</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Osgoode &#187; US 9th Circuit puts foot down: Eminem iTunes royalties decision stands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=909#comment-5935</guid>
		<description>[...] to the language of the recording contract. Reactions to the ruling have been mixed, as while some do not expected the decision &#8220;to have much of a practical impact on the recording [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the language of the recording contract. Reactions to the ruling have been mixed, as while some do not expected the decision &#8220;to have much of a practical impact on the recording [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trademark Licensees Catch a Tax Break by Tweets that mention Trademark Licensees Catch a Tax Break « The Licensing Law Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/09/trademark-licensees-catch-a-tax-break/comment-page-1/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Trademark Licensees Catch a Tax Break « The Licensing Law Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=871#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Meg Langley Grainger, Dana Newman. Dana Newman said: RT @MegLG: Trade mark Licensees Catch a Tax Break in the U.S. http://ow.ly/2zPYw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Meg Langley Grainger, Dana Newman. Dana Newman said: RT @MegLG: Trade mark Licensees Catch a Tax Break in the U.S. <a href="http://ow.ly/2zPYw" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/2zPYw</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IP &amp; Licensing Trends in Japan by ebook publisher</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/08/ip-licensing-trends-in-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator>ebook publisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=820#comment-1962</guid>
		<description>As an ebook publisher I find your blog interesting and helpful. Thanks for taking the time to write this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ebook publisher I find your blog interesting and helpful. Thanks for taking the time to write this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fashion Licensing Corner: Japanese Designers Need to Protect, Monetize Their Ideas by Japan: good at creating but not good at protecting IP and selling &#171; creative industries @ rikkyo</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/01/fashion-licensing-corner-japanese-designers-need-to-protect-monetize-their-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Japan: good at creating but not good at protecting IP and selling &#171; creative industries @ rikkyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 05:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=258#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>[...] Japan: good at creating but not good at protecting IP and&#160;selling    While doing research on Japanese creative industries,　I came across this blog by The Licensing Law Blog which on Fashion Licensing Corner: Japanese Designers Need to Protect, Monetize Their Ideas. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Japan: good at creating but not good at protecting IP and&nbsp;selling    While doing research on Japanese creative industries,　I came across this blog by The Licensing Law Blog which on Fashion Licensing Corner: Japanese Designers Need to Protect, Monetize Their Ideas. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fashion Licensing Corner: Legal Protection for Fashion Designs by Tweets that mention Fashion Licensing Corner: Legal Protection for Fashion Designs « The Licensing Law Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/06/fashion-licensing-corner-legal-protection-for-fashion-designs/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Fashion Licensing Corner: Legal Protection for Fashion Designs « The Licensing Law Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=674#comment-719</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robb Shecter, TS. TS said: TM Protection for fashion. Explained? http://bit.ly/b1QJKT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robb Shecter, TS. TS said: TM Protection for fashion. Explained? <a href="http://bit.ly/b1QJKT" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b1QJKT</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Startup Corner: Tips To Protect Your IP by IP Law Overview &#171; Putting IP Law In To Layman&#39;s Terms</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/04/startup-corner-good-housekeeping-rules-for-your-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Law Overview &#171; Putting IP Law In To Layman&#39;s Terms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=504#comment-608</guid>
		<description>[...] http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/04/startup-corner-good-housekeeping-rules-for-your-ip/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/04/startup-corner-good-housekeeping-rules-for-your-ip/" rel="nofollow">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/04/startup-corner-good-housekeeping-rules-for-your-ip/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Uncertain Law of Dead Celebrity Goods, Sexy Einstein Edition by Richard R. Bergovoy</title>
		<link>http://thelicensinglawblog.com/2010/05/the-uncertain-law-of-dead-celebrity-goods-einstein-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard R. Bergovoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelicensinglawblog.com/?p=610#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the good links, Robin. Too bad GM&#039;s licensing and advertising people were not aware of them.
Yes, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem owns all of Einstein&#039;s intellectual property (patent, copyrights, trademarks, rights of publicity), and they use GreenLight as their licensing agents to  license it out. As I said in the post, my guess (and that&#039;s all it is) is that GM paid somebody for a copyright license for the Einstein photo. But that would only have given GM the rights to reproduce the photograph. If GM wanted to use Einstein&#039;s persona to promote its cars in advertisements, then GM probably needed to purchase a rights of publicity license. If it wanted to sell Einstein branded motor vehicles or imply that Einstein approved of or endorsed GM motor vehicles, then it probably needed to purchase a trademark license. (As a practical matter, rights of publicity licenses and trademark licenses are often bundled in celebrity endorsement deals.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the good links, Robin. Too bad GM&#8217;s licensing and advertising people were not aware of them.<br />
Yes, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem owns all of Einstein&#8217;s intellectual property (patent, copyrights, trademarks, rights of publicity), and they use GreenLight as their licensing agents to  license it out. As I said in the post, my guess (and that&#8217;s all it is) is that GM paid somebody for a copyright license for the Einstein photo. But that would only have given GM the rights to reproduce the photograph. If GM wanted to use Einstein&#8217;s persona to promote its cars in advertisements, then GM probably needed to purchase a rights of publicity license. If it wanted to sell Einstein branded motor vehicles or imply that Einstein approved of or endorsed GM motor vehicles, then it probably needed to purchase a trademark license. (As a practical matter, rights of publicity licenses and trademark licenses are often bundled in celebrity endorsement deals.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

